<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Siskel &#038; Ebert review Rattle and Hum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.atu2blog.com/2007/12/28/siskel-ebert-review-rattle-and-hum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.atu2blog.com/2007/12/28/siskel-ebert-review-rattle-and-hum/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Edwardo</title>
		<link>http://www.atu2blog.com/2007/12/28/siskel-ebert-review-rattle-and-hum/#comment-28145</link>
		<dc:creator>Edwardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 13:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atu2blog.com/2007/12/28/siskel-ebert-review-rattle-and-hum/#comment-28145</guid>
		<description>What do you guys have against siskel!?

RIP SISKEL DON'T LET THE BASTARDS GRIND YA DOWN!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you guys have against siskel!?</p>
<p>RIP SISKEL DON&#8217;T LET THE BASTARDS GRIND YA DOWN!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sian</title>
		<link>http://www.atu2blog.com/2007/12/28/siskel-ebert-review-rattle-and-hum/#comment-27960</link>
		<dc:creator>Sian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atu2blog.com/2007/12/28/siskel-ebert-review-rattle-and-hum/#comment-27960</guid>
		<description>I liked the movie, but I agree that they were a bit inarticulate in the first part...But other that that, it was great! I didn't get why it was PG-13 though. It only had, like, two swears!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the movie, but I agree that they were a bit inarticulate in the first part&#8230;But other that that, it was great! I didn&#8217;t get why it was PG-13 though. It only had, like, two swears!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sirensong</title>
		<link>http://www.atu2blog.com/2007/12/28/siskel-ebert-review-rattle-and-hum/#comment-27103</link>
		<dc:creator>sirensong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 16:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atu2blog.com/2007/12/28/siskel-ebert-review-rattle-and-hum/#comment-27103</guid>
		<description>I personally enjoyed the not-so-perfect looking aspects of the film. U2 - inarticulate, incomprehensible, amateurs?  Felt like Siskel (the 1st guy) was excessively reaching for criticism here. A way-off, seriously bad reveiw...Guess they're just human as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally enjoyed the not-so-perfect looking aspects of the film. U2 - inarticulate, incomprehensible, amateurs?  Felt like Siskel (the 1st guy) was excessively reaching for criticism here. A way-off, seriously bad reveiw&#8230;Guess they&#8217;re just human as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://www.atu2blog.com/2007/12/28/siskel-ebert-review-rattle-and-hum/#comment-26794</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atu2blog.com/2007/12/28/siskel-ebert-review-rattle-and-hum/#comment-26794</guid>
		<description>funny. i actually remember this when it did first air -- back when i was just an 'intro' u2 fan, and i remember how this review spurned me to go see the movie because i figured if the 'estabolishment' thought it was crap, it HAD to be good.

and i think rattle and hum stands as an awesome performance archive of the joshua tree period. (but i'm a big fan, and can appreciate such things.)

thanks for posting the great memory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>funny. i actually remember this when it did first air &#8212; back when i was just an &#8216;intro&#8217; u2 fan, and i remember how this review spurned me to go see the movie because i figured if the &#8216;estabolishment&#8217; thought it was crap, it HAD to be good.</p>
<p>and i think rattle and hum stands as an awesome performance archive of the joshua tree period. (but i&#8217;m a big fan, and can appreciate such things.)</p>
<p>thanks for posting the great memory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silvrlvr</title>
		<link>http://www.atu2blog.com/2007/12/28/siskel-ebert-review-rattle-and-hum/#comment-26371</link>
		<dc:creator>Silvrlvr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atu2blog.com/2007/12/28/siskel-ebert-review-rattle-and-hum/#comment-26371</guid>
		<description>Roger Ebert is absolutely right. Viewed as a film only, it is a mess. And it has not improved with age. It's  hard to believe U2, being the marketing machine it is now, ever would have let it see the light of day. But lessons were obviously learned from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger Ebert is absolutely right. Viewed as a film only, it is a mess. And it has not improved with age. It&#8217;s  hard to believe U2, being the marketing machine it is now, ever would have let it see the light of day. But lessons were obviously learned from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moi</title>
		<link>http://www.atu2blog.com/2007/12/28/siskel-ebert-review-rattle-and-hum/#comment-26363</link>
		<dc:creator>Moi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 19:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atu2blog.com/2007/12/28/siskel-ebert-review-rattle-and-hum/#comment-26363</guid>
		<description>He spoke badly of one of my favourite songs (Running To Standstill), and I think he dowsn't understand the movie because he is not a fan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He spoke badly of one of my favourite songs (Running To Standstill), and I think he dowsn&#8217;t understand the movie because he is not a fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarry</title>
		<link>http://www.atu2blog.com/2007/12/28/siskel-ebert-review-rattle-and-hum/#comment-26324</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 08:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atu2blog.com/2007/12/28/siskel-ebert-review-rattle-and-hum/#comment-26324</guid>
		<description>amateur night
inarticulate
badly lit
incomprehensible singing
"'one of the guys' does make a political statement....." 

hysterically bad review of what we now know and love as the best/worst 'little' road movie ever made. 

thanks for sharing...i think!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amateur night<br />
inarticulate<br />
badly lit<br />
incomprehensible singing<br />
&#8220;&#8216;one of the guys&#8217; does make a political statement&#8230;..&#8221; </p>
<p>hysterically bad review of what we now know and love as the best/worst &#8216;little&#8217; road movie ever made. </p>
<p>thanks for sharing&#8230;i think!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
