<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U2&#8242;s GOYB video not quite ready&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.atu2blog.com/u2s-goyb-video-not-quite-ready/1170/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.atu2blog.com/u2s-goyb-video-not-quite-ready/1170/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:54:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://www.atu2blog.com/u2s-goyb-video-not-quite-ready/1170/comment-page-1/#comment-159772</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atu2blog.com/?p=1170#comment-159772</guid>
		<description>you can still check it in my blog: 

www.i-have-heard.blogspot.com

go there and leave a comment :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can still check it in my blog: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.i-have-heard.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.i-have-heard.blogspot.com</a></p>
<p>go there and leave a comment <img src='http://www.atu2blog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jer</title>
		<link>http://www.atu2blog.com/u2s-goyb-video-not-quite-ready/1170/comment-page-1/#comment-159181</link>
		<dc:creator>Jer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atu2blog.com/?p=1170#comment-159181</guid>
		<description>Looks like there were legal issues involved after all.  According to U2.com it had to do with the watermarks and &quot;legal issues&quot;:  &quot;if you saw that ruff-cut the give-away was the watermark copyright details in some of the images. Turns out there were legal issues involved&quot;   And they&#039;re ticked about the leak of the &quot;rogue copy&quot;, so it&#039;s not a conspiracy to amp up the hype for the video, either:  &quot;Word is that everyone was pretty fed up about an unfinished bootleg leaking out before the production team had finished their work.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like there were legal issues involved after all.  According to U2.com it had to do with the watermarks and &#8220;legal issues&#8221;:  &#8220;if you saw that ruff-cut the give-away was the watermark copyright details in some of the images. Turns out there were legal issues involved&#8221;   And they&#8217;re ticked about the leak of the &#8220;rogue copy&#8221;, so it&#8217;s not a conspiracy to amp up the hype for the video, either:  &#8220;Word is that everyone was pretty fed up about an unfinished bootleg leaking out before the production team had finished their work.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silvrlvr</title>
		<link>http://www.atu2blog.com/u2s-goyb-video-not-quite-ready/1170/comment-page-1/#comment-159176</link>
		<dc:creator>Silvrlvr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atu2blog.com/?p=1170#comment-159176</guid>
		<description>@keir, on the other hand, Getty Images and the other stock companies are professional to deal with, if you do business with them regularly. The Getty web site is super easy to navigate if you have an account with them, and the Getty folks have been good to bloggers over the years. 

I also wonder how the &quot;rogue&quot; copy got out. I suspect somebody who had a copy of it and was susequently told to hold onto it might be the culprit. At least two Web sites (the Irish Independent and ITV) would have had an advance look at the vid, since they were both scheduled to post it,  and you know something like that would probably get passed round interoffice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@keir, on the other hand, Getty Images and the other stock companies are professional to deal with, if you do business with them regularly. The Getty web site is super easy to navigate if you have an account with them, and the Getty folks have been good to bloggers over the years. </p>
<p>I also wonder how the &#8220;rogue&#8221; copy got out. I suspect somebody who had a copy of it and was susequently told to hold onto it might be the culprit. At least two Web sites (the Irish Independent and ITV) would have had an advance look at the vid, since they were both scheduled to post it,  and you know something like that would probably get passed round interoffice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bakerboy</title>
		<link>http://www.atu2blog.com/u2s-goyb-video-not-quite-ready/1170/comment-page-1/#comment-159085</link>
		<dc:creator>Bakerboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 09:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atu2blog.com/?p=1170#comment-159085</guid>
		<description>Ah.....fitting isn&#039;t it?  It&#039;s always about the nipple.  Reminds me of a Superbowl a while back where Janet Jackson was.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah&#8230;..fitting isn&#8217;t it?  It&#8217;s always about the nipple.  Reminds me of a Superbowl a while back where Janet Jackson was&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purplefish</title>
		<link>http://www.atu2blog.com/u2s-goyb-video-not-quite-ready/1170/comment-page-1/#comment-158983</link>
		<dc:creator>purplefish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 02:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atu2blog.com/?p=1170#comment-158983</guid>
		<description>:) think there was also a problem with bono&#039;s lip synch . .. unless i&#039;m mistaken (heh, its happened before) he appears to be saying blowing up instead of growing up at one point. . . be interesting to see what the final released version of the vid is like . . . fingers crossed the differences won&#039;t be too apparent :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://www.atu2blog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  think there was also a problem with bono&#8217;s lip synch . .. unless i&#8217;m mistaken (heh, its happened before) he appears to be saying blowing up instead of growing up at one point. . . be interesting to see what the final released version of the vid is like . . . fingers crossed the differences won&#8217;t be too apparent <img src='http://www.atu2blog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbeano</title>
		<link>http://www.atu2blog.com/u2s-goyb-video-not-quite-ready/1170/comment-page-1/#comment-158965</link>
		<dc:creator>mbeano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atu2blog.com/?p=1170#comment-158965</guid>
		<description>NO NIPPLE ON THE HORIZON</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO NIPPLE ON THE HORIZON</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burger</title>
		<link>http://www.atu2blog.com/u2s-goyb-video-not-quite-ready/1170/comment-page-1/#comment-158958</link>
		<dc:creator>burger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atu2blog.com/?p=1170#comment-158958</guid>
		<description>aww..come on!  we got to see side-nipple in &#039;with or without you&#039;...why not here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aww..come on!  we got to see side-nipple in &#8216;with or without you&#8217;&#8230;why not here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lordache</title>
		<link>http://www.atu2blog.com/u2s-goyb-video-not-quite-ready/1170/comment-page-1/#comment-158955</link>
		<dc:creator>lordache</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atu2blog.com/?p=1170#comment-158955</guid>
		<description>yeah dude its definitely because the nipple</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah dude its definitely because the nipple</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: u2rock</title>
		<link>http://www.atu2blog.com/u2s-goyb-video-not-quite-ready/1170/comment-page-1/#comment-158954</link>
		<dc:creator>u2rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atu2blog.com/?p=1170#comment-158954</guid>
		<description>video can be viewed @ u2jam if your quick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>video can be viewed @ u2jam if your quick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watts</title>
		<link>http://www.atu2blog.com/u2s-goyb-video-not-quite-ready/1170/comment-page-1/#comment-158811</link>
		<dc:creator>Watts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atu2blog.com/?p=1170#comment-158811</guid>
		<description>I noticed the watermarks from Getty.... I thought they were there on purpose, that U2 was playing on it while using all those images...  ZooTV kinda thing... who owns art/stealing from the thieves.  Placemarkers, harumpf!  I say keep &#039;em, and don&#039;t pay royalties, just to be rock&#039;n&#039;roll about it.  
Thanks for the leak, and the nip!  Best U2 video in ages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed the watermarks from Getty&#8230;. I thought they were there on purpose, that U2 was playing on it while using all those images&#8230;  ZooTV kinda thing&#8230; who owns art/stealing from the thieves.  Placemarkers, harumpf!  I say keep &#8216;em, and don&#8217;t pay royalties, just to be rock&#8217;n'roll about it.<br />
Thanks for the leak, and the nip!  Best U2 video in ages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

